Don’t worry, Mr President. There are no surprises here. Signed: Israel
In a ynetnews report of the meeting between Israeli Prime Minister Lapid and USA President Biden, the latter is quoted as having said:
“Don’t surprise us,” when it comes to the matter of the Israel-Palestinian conflict and West Bank settlements.
Some social media reactions to this suggest that he is asking Israel to promise that decisions regarding Judea-Samaria are made either in consultation with the USA or in line with what we know the USA would approve of. Therefore, they say, this is another demonstration of the fact that Israel does not yet get that we are a sovereign nation making decisions based on our own needs and interests and not as dictated by another country, however friendly that country may purport to be. After all, there is no other country in the world that asks any other country for permission to build houses. And the leader of no other country would respond with a smile when asked to do so.
I would like to make two points regarding this small moment in a visit that provided much material with which journalists, analysts and social media pundits can make hay for quite some time:
- The “don’t surprise us” language first turned up (under Obama) regarding security issues, especially Iran. In other words, Obama did not want to see another case of surprise attack similar to Operation Babylon, when we took out the Iraqi Osirak nuclear reactor in 1981. Here Biden was specific about the fact that he was referring to settlements in Judea-Samaria (and not security) and we can thus imply that he is not averse to us carrying out a surprise attack against nuclear sites in Iran. One could say, in fact, that a surprise attack against such targets would come as no surprise to anyone anywhere.
- Surprises regarding Judea-Samaria settlements? There really are no surprises here and that is unfortunate, in my opinion. It is not surprising when we freeze Jewish construction starts in Judea-Samaria and what others consider contentious parts of Jerusalem. We have been doing this for decades when an important visit is about to take place or when Washington announces a new contract involving some Arab country and they don’t want us Jews to spoil it by having the gall to build on our own land that others say is not really ours. And it is equally not surprising when we resume planning and construction works immediately after the important event.
What is surprising is the fact that recently, after a two-decade court battle, the Israeli Supreme Court upheld Israel’s claim to Area 918 in the South Hebron Hills. The same court had earlier found Khan al-Ahmar illegal and subject to immediate evaculation. What is not surprising (sadly so) is that Khan al-Ahmar has still not been taken down, and what is surprising is the swiftness by which the bulldozers moved onto the land to take down illegal squatters’ huts in Area 918 and the IDF began carrying out live-fire trainings because it was once more safe to do so (no more illegal civilians in the area who could get hurt).
What is not surprising is the uproar on the part of leftist anti-Israel NGOs funded by antisemitic European political bodies who do everything they can to prevent us Jews from doing anything that has the flavour of sovereignty.
What is surprising is that I have not seen any official Israeli response either way to their accusations and propaganda. Ignoring such lies may mean that they continue to circulate unchallenged on the social media and anti-Israel mainstream media. However, we are too often witness to our own elected representatives supporting the views of those who hate us (such as accepting it as truth when B’tselem makes claims of settler violence before an investigation can prove whether the violence was defensive or offensive, provoked or unprovoked). Therefore, silence is welcome in this case.
The Biden visit is over. We can go back to business as usual. The traffic in Jerusalem has gone back to normal. Aside from the suprising glitch in the South Hebron Hills, there will be no surprises in Judea-Samaria for the foreseeable future. When it seems, for some unfathomable reason, in our interest to do so, we freeze Jewish house-building as an act of appeasement and subordination to some “significant other”. And when they turn their backs, or enough time has gone by, we resume building Jewish homes.
How sad is this!!
But this does not have to be the end of the story. Click on the poster to get to the Sovereignty Movement website and learn more about what we can do to get us out of the appeasement mentality.
Feature Image Credit: Avishag Shaar-Yashuv (GPO)
I am of course not an expert and relay only on what is left of my bad and selective memory but I vaguely remember (too tired to look it up!) that the British Mandate was unanimously endorsed by both Houses of Congress of the USA legally recognizing the rights of the Jews to recover their National Homeland and settle anywhere on the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. This was put into law, what has happen to that? And what has happen to the more recent “Taylor Law” forbiting the USA to finance terrorist organizations?
I do not think you are the one suffering from selective memory in this case. Thanks for pointing me in that direction. I just looked it up and found something quite remarkable — the agreed upon Congressional resolution in 1922 is far more far-reaching than us wanting-everyone-to-like-us Jews ever dared to carry out. Had we done it then, we would not be facing the issues we are facing now. I think I will upload it as a separate article here on this website at some point.
What happens to such resolutions and laws? Ignored whenever convenient for those who want to keep today’s Jews under control.